The notes will introduce the types of recurrence, and the corresponding solution for all these recurrence, including some general telescoping methods and Master Theorem etc.
Telescoping a (linear firstorder) recurrence
Linear firstorder recurrence telescope to a sum.
When the coeffients are 1
Just telescope it. $a_n = a_n+n$ with $a_0=1$
Elementary discrete sums
* geometric series
* arthimetic series
* bionmial (upper)
* bionmial theorem
* Harmonic numbers
* vandermonde convolution
When the coffeients are not 1
Multiply/divid by a summation factor. $a_n = 2a_{n1} + 2^n$ with $a_0=0$ Divide by $2^n$
why 2^n? summation factor
For $a_n =x_na_{n1}+….$
=> Divid by $x_n \cdot x_{n1} \cdot x_{n2}…..x_1$
Then summation factor:
therefore,
Types of recurrences
First Order
linear: $a_n = na_{n1}  1$
summation factor + telescoping => Divid by $x_n \cdot x_{n1} \cdot x_{n2}…..x_1$
nolinear: $a_n = \frac {1}{a_{n1}}$
noclosed form solution
Simple Convergence
Quadratic convergence and Newton’s method
Slow convergence
Second Order
Linear recurrences with constant coefficients)
1. GF
1.1 OGF for linear recurrences.
where $g(z) = 1 x_{1}z  x_{2}z^2….x_{t}z^t$ , dependens on initial values
$a_0,a_1,…a_{t1}$
for simple OGF, we can lookup the OGF table to get the a(n). However, sometimes, the a(z) is complexed expressed by z.
then we can expand generating functions or find functional equations on generating fucntions, to transform the generating function into the coeffient form of l(z)z^N Example Solving linear recurrence
Step 1: make recurence valid for all n
when $a_0=0$, it need no delta. when $a_1=1$, it need $\delta_{n1} = 1$, only works when n = 1 when $a_2=4$, it need $\delta_{n2} = 1$, only works when n = 2 So
Step 2: multiple by $z^n$, and sum on n
since there will only a z for n = 1, and $z^2$ for n = 2.
Step 3: Solve A(z)
easy found that in the above formation of $\frac {f(z)}{g(z)}$
Step 4: Simplify or partial fractions.
, sometimes, there will be partial fractions.
Step 5: Expand A(Z) to get a_n
some other application of generating functions: Probability Generating Functions to simplify the caculation for expectation and so on, Bivariate Generating Functions based couting and analysis of cost paramters.
2. Operate Method(Multiple roots $x^n$)
We have given a method for finding an exact solution for any linear recurrence. The process makes explicit the way in which the full solution is determined by the initial conditions. When the coefficients turn out to be zero and/or some roots have the same modulus, the result can be somewhat counterintuitive, though easily understood in this context
3. Analytic combinatorics
Symbolic methods, see more on Analytic combinatorics.
Step 1: Combinatatorial constructions
Step 2: Symblic transfer , Get GF equations.
Step 3: analytic transfer , Get coefficient asymptotic
variable coefficients: $a_n = na_{n1}+ (n1)a_{n2} + 1$

summation factor => Divided by n!

Symbolic solution

GF and approximation methods
nolinear: $a_n = a_{n1} a_{n2} + \sqrt [2]{a_{n2}}$
Higher Order
$a_n = f(a_{n1},a_{n2},a_{nt})$
Full History
$a_n = n+a_{n1}+a_{n2}+…a_{1}$
DivideandConquer
$a_n = n+a_{\lfloor{n/2}\rfloor}+a_{\lceil{n/2}\rceil}+n$
Classic examples:
* Binary search
* Mergesort
* Bather network
* Karatsuba multiplication
* Strassen matrix multiplication
Pattern:
 Dividing into a parts of size about $N/\beta$
 Solving recuresively
 Combining solutions with extra cost $\Theta(N^{\gamma}(\log_N)^\delta)$
with alpha terms for the sum, telescoping, is given by
More about Master Theorem, “A Master Theorem for Discrete Divide and Conquer Recurrences”, SODA 2011
Methods for solving recurrence
1. Change of Variable
2. Repertorie
Another path to exact solutions in some cases is the socalled repertoire method, where we use known functions to find a family of solutions similar to the one sought, which can be combined to give the answer. This method primarily applies to linear recurrences, involving the following steps:
 Relax the recurrence by adding an extra functional term.
 Substitute known functions into the recurrence to derive identities similar to the recurrence.

Take linear combinations of such identities to derive an equation identical to the recurrence.
The success of this method depends on being able to find a set of independent solutions, and on properly handling initial conditions. Intuition or knowledge about the form of the solution can be useful in determining the repertoire. The classic example of the use of this method is in the analysis of an equivalence algorithm by Knuth and Schönhage
3. Bootstrapping
Often we are able to guess the approximate value of the solution to a recurrence. Then, the recurrence itself can be used to place constraints on the estimate that can be used to give a more accurate estimate. Informally, this method involves the following steps:
 Use the recurrence to calculate numerical values.
 Guess the approximate form of the solution.
 Substitute the approximate solution back into the recurrence.
 Prove tighter bounds on the solution, based on the guessed solution and the substitution. For illustrative purposes, suppose that we apply this method to the Fibonacci recurrence: for n > 1 with a0 = 0 and a1 = 1.
First, we note that an is increasing. Therefore, $ a_{n – 1} > a_{n – 2} and a_n > 2a_{n–2}$ Iterating this inequality implies that an > 2^{n/2}, so we know that an has at least an exponential rate of growth. On the other hand, $a_{n – 2} < a_{n –1}$ implies that $ a_n < 2a_{n – 1}, or (iterating) a_n < 2^n $. Thus we have proved upper and lower exponentially growing bounds on an and we can feel justified in “guessing” a solution of the form $a_n \sim c0{\alpha}^n$, where $\sqrt[2]{2} <\alpha < 2$ From the recurrence, we can conclude that a must satisfy $a^2 – a – 1 = 0$ Having determined the value a, we can bootstrap and go back to the recurrence and the initial values to find the appropriate coefficients.
4. Perturbation
Another path to an approximate solution to a recurrence is to solve a simpler related recurrence. This is a general approach to solving recurrences that consists of first studying simplified recurrences obtained by extracting what seems to be dominant parts, then solving the simplified recurrence, and finally comparing solutions of the original recurrence to those of the simplified recurrence. This technique is akin to a class of methods familiar in numerical analysis, perturbation methods. Informally, this method involves the following steps:
 Modify the recurrence slightly to find a known recurrence.
 Change variables to pull out the known bounds and transform into a recurrence on the (smaller) unknown part of the solution.
 Bound the unknown “error” term.